Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Confessions of a Legal Recruiter: Partners pay a price for not understanding how they are paid
Confessions of a Legal Recruiter: Partners pay a price for not understanding how they are paid By Shari Davidson Most [...]
Work-life balance: Why lawyers really struggle
Achieving balance is not as simple as saying “no” and guarding your personal time. But that’s a good first step. [...]
Social media for attorneys: Staying visible as searches change
While social media has been a hit-or-miss proposition for law firm business development, attorneys who do not post regularly will [...]
How to become the top lawyer in your niche
Lawyers who are a cut above their competition usually outwork and outthink their rivals in client satisfaction. Read more @ [...]
