Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Public Relations: Why engaging a PR professional is essential for attorneys
Public Relations: Why engaging a PR professional is essential for attorneys By Ellen Keiley Before engaging a public relations professional [...]
For lawyers looking to make it rain: Discipline eats motivation for breakfast
The motivation to achieve worthwhile goals comes and goes; it’s having the discipline to start and then keep up with [...]
7 strategies to maximize your AI-powered search market share
Here are tips for “future-proofing” a prominent position for your firm by saturating the search engine results pages (SERPs) of [...]
After 35 years, now what’s next for law firms?
The authors look back at how well one of them did in 1989 when she predicted coming trends in the [...]
