Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Know when to ‘Just Say No’
Know when to 'Just Say No' By Sari W. Montgomery In the wake of recent well-publicized scandals involving clients using [...]
Go beyond Google: the best alternative search engines
Worried about privacy and anticompetitive practices, or maybe you want new online search options? We recommend you start with these [...]
Practical preparation for project management tools
Project management tools are a way to help your law firm run more efficiently on both the legal matter management [...]
12 Thoughts on promises and challenges of AI in legal practice
Here are several key takeaways from the Harvard Law AI Summit organized by the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School in September. [...]
Help your firm by learning basic business analysis
With only a little formal training, widely available at affordable prices, law firm sales and marketing professionals can become “understand [...]
