Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Digital Marketing: Organic searches vs. AI-powered web traffic: Trends that matter to legal marketers
Digital Marketing: Organic searches vs. AI-powered web traffic: Trends that matter to legal marketers By Guy Alvarez Law firms across [...]
How to create a marketing budget
All marketing is not created equal. Establishing a budget allows you to better tell which marketing expenditures are paying off [...]
A lawyer’s supporting role is often the strongest: Showing up for clients
Some thoughts on how lawyers can earn the enduring trust of clients and build relationships for the long term. Read [...]
When risky cybersecurity behavior becomes a habit among employees
Even in the most security-conscious firms, employee behavior toward browsing the web and handling email creates vulnerability to cyber attack, [...]
