Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Public Relations: Why PR and earned media are now essential for SEO and AI visibility
Public Relations: Why PR and earned media are now essential for SEO and AI visibility By Ellen Keiley AI has [...]
Practical steps to reduce cyber insurance costs
Multifactor ID verification, password security, and frequent employee training sessions are recommended for law firms seeking to keep premium costs [...]
The hidden economics of student recruitment by law firms
An expert says law firms often don’t realize how much they spend on recruiting students, nor how best to manage [...]
Are AI hallucinations predictable?
A new analysis finds that AI-generated hallucination is a “foreseeable engineering risk” – meaning that its occurrence can be somewhat [...]
