Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Digital Marketing: What NOT to do when designing a law firm website
Digital Marketing: What NOT to do when designing a law firm website By Kevin Vermeulen A well-designed website that reflects [...]
The mental health of lawyers may be improving, but stressors remain
The latest ALM survey of lawyers’ mental well-being shows some positive trends, though chronic concerns like overwork and overly demanding [...]
How to not talk politics in the workplace and survive
In today’s volatile world, talking politics in the workplace is mostly a lose-lose proposition. These suggestions can help steer conversations [...]
On deciding whether to travel for clients
An attorney must weigh several factors when deciding whether to travel several hours to perform work for a client or [...]
