Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Practice automation has become a strategic imperative for law firms
Practice Automation: Practice automation has become a strategic imperative for law firms By Carl Mazzanti The question for many law firms [...]
The most important question you can ask a new client
The answer to “How did you hear about us?” can bring valuable insights into the effectiveness of a firm’s marketing [...]
Strategies for negotiating legal fee increases
Raising rates on clients can be stressful. But using these approaches may make the process easier for lawyers. Read more [...]
How to write attorney bios that do the job
Among the tips from an expert: Send the strongest “E-E-A-T” signal you can and “specific is terrific.” Read more @ [...]
