Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Digital Marketing: AI vs. human-powered content creation: How to strike the perfect balance
Digital Marketing: AI vs. human-powered content creation: How to strike the perfect balance By Laurie Villanueva More and more legal marketers [...]
So you want to write a book? Tips for getting started
Lawyers’ motivation for wanting to write a book varies widely, from expanding a client base to fulfilling a bucket-list goal. [...]
Parental leave at law firms: Policy v. culture
Parental leave policies at most American law firms are relatively generous. But then cultural and economic factors often complicate matters. [...]
Making business development an everyday part of the practice
Lawyers who are most successful at developing business don’t treat it as something separate from their legal work; they make [...]
