Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform

Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Public Relations: Why visibility matters in a competitive legal market
Public Relations: Why visibility matters in a competitive legal market By Ellen Keiley It is not unusual for a lawyer [...]
What new law partners need to do to build a book of business
One of the new responsibilities of newly minted partners is to bring new business into their firms in ways they [...]
Memory hacks that make you more productive
Lawyers face critical memory challenges all the time. Here are some tools that will help you hone your recall skills. [...]
Are Meta Ads right for you?
By asking some simple questions, law firms can determine whether Meta Ads will effectively reach potential clients on Facebook, Instagram [...]