Defendant used ChatGPT to counter expert declaration
The plaintiff in a patent suit involving the definition of foam used a technical expert with four decades of experience to define the disputed term. The defendant used ChatGPT to counter his declaration. How did it turn out? Read more ediscoverytoday.com
Share this story, choose a platform

Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Succession Planning: Retirement succession requires careful planning, management
Succession Planning: Retirement succession requires careful planning, management By David E. Wood Baby Boom generation law partners are not doing [...]
Three thoughts on legal services pricing
By sticking to the principles of certainty, adaptability, and value, lawyers can set prices that are fair to themselves and [...]
In praise of ‘pausitivity,’ the breaks in routine that renew productivity, creativity
Professionals who make "pausitivity" a habit during their otherwise intense working days will improve efficiency and may also ease stress-related [...]
Significant legal opinions (so far) involving generative artificial intelligence
The author employs leading GenAI programs to produce a compendium of formal ethics rulings about lawyers and their use of [...]