Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Sign Up For Our
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Public Relations: Simple ways to build visibility in 2026
Public Relations: Simple ways to build visibility in 2026 By Ellen Keiley A new year offers a natural reset – [...]
Managing the stress of being a firm’s ‘responsible one’
Five ways to manage chronic responsibility and burnout, without guilt. Read more @ attorneyatwork.com
Why good lawyers aren’t necessary the most successful lawyers
The very qualities that make some lawyers good at the law, such as aversion to risk, may also be hindering [...]
A guide to writing the best online attorney bio
The way a potential client views your bio may be the difference between losing that customer or compelling them to [...]
