Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Reputational Management: Plan today for law firm lateral exits and client disputes
A law firm’s reputation is its greatest asset. How you manage client disputes, partner moves, or internal challenges can trigger [...]
How to create a law firm plan for 2026 that doesn’t die in a drawer
The key to an annual plan’s success: Make goals simple, achievable, and visible. Read more @ attorneyatwork.com
What is domain authority and how is it relevant for law firms?
Domain authority is a benchmark for a website’s overall strength and credibility. It predicts how highly a site will rank [...]
Stop forcing functional experts into people management jobs
Being proficient technically in the law does not necessarily give those lawyers the skills to properly manage people. Read more [...]
