Judge: No AI in my courtroom unless a human verifies its accuracy
A federal judge in Texas has a new rule: No submissions written by artificial intelligence unless its output is checked by a human. He also ordered lawyers to attest that humans either wrote or reviewed their filings. Read more at arstechnica.com
Share this story, choose a platform
Brought to you by BridgeTower Media
Free Weekly Newsletter
Recommended content
Succession Planning :The illusion of law firm permanence vs. the reality of good succession planning
Succession Planning :The illusion of law firm permanence vs. the reality of good succession planning By David E. Wood Law [...]
How to use marketing to raise legal rates
When your great marketing content has established you as the go-to expert in your practice area, you can charge clients [...]
Credit risk from cyber attacks on the rise, Moody’s Ratings says
Moody’s sees attacks continuing to accelerate in 2025 due to AI-aided hacks, coupled with an expected loosening by Washington of [...]
The verities of the holiday season also reflect the best values of LPM
If legal project management (LPM) is done right, its core principles of respect, understanding, harmony, and a sense of belonging [...]
